July 2022 Newsletter Fiction Preview: At the Edge of Legend

Well, it’s almost that time again. Only a few more days left in Q2, and then it will be July 1st 2022, and Q3 will begin. Of course, as is (sorta becoming) tradition I’ll have a new newsletter for you. And also a brand new piece of fiction for subscribers (so please sign up!).

This time I tried to write something of a parody. While it’s set in the same universe as Farewell to Rusalka, it introduces some new characters which I hope you’ll enjoy. I think the Witcher vibes will probably be most prevalent, but there’s little bits of other Fantasy stories in there as well. I specifically drew on another fantasy series for this opening so I’m curious if anyone will guess it.

(also I’m very proud of myself for designing and creating the “cover” image below all on my own. Not sure if I’ll keep doing these as I’m not a great artist but this came out alright I think!)

Anyway, here’s a preview of this next newsletter’s quarterly short fiction (you can also check out any of my previous previews and more on my fiction page!) Enjoy!

In a certain time, in a certain kingdom, likely before now, but possibly much later, a woman and her horse set off on the journey away from Detskiy Dvorets along the freezing road which was considered the gateway to the west. She was followed closely by a boy, with no horse, who despite the general inconvenience of his condition, did not notice the numbness of his toes or the dull ache of exhaustion in his limbs. He focused on that point in the freezing road at the end of his sight where the path rounded a bluff of snow or crested a hill; that point just beyond reach where, the boy was certain, a legend would begin.

Of course, legends begin in all kinds of places. The woman would be known to legend as Bezmira, and her story would begin after leaving the boy behind in Veliky Ustyug to search for an old house which walked the forest with a hen’s feet and grace. A Tenikosti priest — a practitioner of forbidden rites and unholy magic — drinking in Veliky Ustyug’s raucous distillery had begun his legend long ago and would boast about it to any who would listen. Of course, the town Veliky Ustyug itself was known to as many legends as the grains of rye in its fields, each dating back further than the last, as far back as the first sputtering shift in the machinery of the cosmos.

In this way, every legend has one which precedes it, one which will come after, and many more happening concurrently so that in truth there are no beginnings or endings to legends at all, which are in fact a perpetually bubbling cauldron, stirred lazily while humming a half-remembered tune.

As legends go, the boy did not consider his unexpected arrival at The Children’s Palace on a rainy miserable day completely bereft of any significant astrological activity to be the beginning. Nor did he consider his ninth birthday when his fellow apprentices had gifted him a stubby, single-edged sword — really just a long knife — as a joke instead of a more traditional Kolduner blade to be the beginning. 

But perhaps for the boy, who hadn’t left the Children’s Palace in seven grueling years, this was a beginning.      

The boy gave a start at the whip-like crack of his mentor’s voice. “Pay attention Shashka.” He followed the command with such force that he wrenched a muscle in his back which ached now as if he’d really received a lash. Mutations in his blood meant the pain would leave him quickly.

Other mutations meant that he had a wider field of vision than most and when focused, could take in the details of his surroundings with an animalistic sensitivity and detail.

He saw now that they’d come out of the frozen wilds and reached the middle of a town. Ahead of them was a distillery, and to one side he noticed the wooden onion-shaped domes of a church, while on the other, a bath house. Strangely, outside the bath was a small shrine containing willow bark, a few tenuously lit animal fat candles, and an unusual icon painted in the image of a Domovoi, a bath house guardian.

The rest of the town seemed to consist of the same kind of mundanity he was familiar with from Detskiy Dvorets: pine wood lodgings and dark frozen mud.    

Perhaps even more mud than The Children’s Palace although the boy was too tired to consider things properly. As beginnings went, this one was off to a rather mundane start.

Some villagers slopped here and there, squishing down the street, moving from one hovel to the next, carrying out their business.

He expected them to see the hilt protruding over his right shoulder, or the medallion dangling from his neck, and to gasp or look away quickly. Perhaps they would avert their eyes or make the sign of the cross. Spit at his feet while he passed. He’d been taught to expect as much from the few who returned to Detskiy Dvorets. From the few who lived.

But these villagers did little more than smile pleasantly, and it was Shashka who ended up gasping and lowering his eyes when one of those smiles proved to be missing a tooth.

Embarrassed, he returned his attention to Bezmira who dismounted with a cat-like grace, prowled a quick patrol around her horse to check if anyone might be watching, and then, satisfied no one was, addressed her pupil with an even more cat-like indifference.

“I need to see an old woman rumored to live in the woods around these parts. You’re not ready to come with me so I have to leave you here. Stay and wait if you like or take this opportunity to flee, it makes no difference to me, but know that your life will not be any easier now that you’re outside the walls of Detskiy Dvorets. In fact, it will definitely be harder.

“But a Kolduner’s life may be somewhat easier if he’s useful,” said Bezmira, and stepped forward to produce a small purse of coins, and two small bottles filled with some mysterious liquid, one clear like water, the other dark like the night.

“I know what kind of trouble young Kolduners get up to in the bath house so there isn’t enough coin here for that. But there’s probably enough for a few drafts of spirit. Listen closely to those around you and by the time you run out, I’m sure you’ll find an excuse to earn some more.”

Then Bezmira fixed the boy with a stare so intense and horrifying it could almost be considered motherly. “Don’t try anything bigger than a Nezhit, alright? They say the first pancake is always a blob, only in the Kolduner’s trade blobs mean a slow and agonizing death. I won’t have some bard watch you kill yourself with a stupid mistake and then crow it out for the whole kingdom to hear. We get enough bad press already.”

The boy did his best to reflect his mentor’s earlier aloofness; it seemed to be the effect of all in the  Kolduner trade, at least all that he’d seen.

“You really think a monster would hunt in a back-water village like this?” he looked around a little then fixed his gaze back on his mentor. “Nothing but peasants, probably from as far back as The Confluence. The biggest thing that’s likely to have happened here was a lapta player getting too handsy with his friend’s little sister after practice.”

“Sounds like a monster to me. And let’s say you’re right and there’s nothing here but peasants, from as far back as The Confluence. You don’t think a few curses have been passed down in the women’s circles, or some wannabe Kolduner has been able to figure out a few gestures in all that time?

Shashka did not like the point of her stare when she’d said “wannabe Kolduner”.

“There’ll be bad blood somewhere, and with it a few curses. That’s work for a Kolduner.”

“Besides,” she said remounting her sturdy horse. “I heard there was an incident with a Rusalka not two months past.”

The boy brightened, his mind already imagining himself wading waist deep in the river, sword drawn and his senses heightened, stretching his perception across the rippling flow.

“Gone now though,” Bezmira said, with seemingly no notice of his high hopes, or foolish naivete. She searched the horizon, but for what the boy did not know.

He felt the sigh of disappointment coming but didn’t want to let the emotion show lest Bezmira think him too childish for even this “back-water” town. He let reflex guide him, the years of brutal training shaping the sound of the air as it left his lips.

“Mmm.”

Bezmira stopped her search of the wood line and looked back at the boy with an expression akin to surprise, if the woman had ever felt such a thing. A twitch pulled at the side of her mouth but she didn’t smile.

She adjusted her position in the saddle, making ready to leave in earnest now. “When dawn breaks on the third day, look to the east . . . With your abominable sense of direction you may even catch me returning from the south.”

The simple nod she gave then was as much of a goodbye as she’d ever given within the boy’s memory, and then she galloped off heading west.

The Shashka watched her go a short while, and then hefted the purse she had given him. He eyed the two flacons of potion with unease. He had never taken them himself, only heard tell of their affects from the older boys in Detskiy Dvorets. He stowed them on his belt, and then walked into the distillery.

Perhaps his legend was about to begin . . .


Thanks again for reading! The rest of this piece will be sent out to newsletter subscribers on July 1st. I hope you’ll consider signing up!

In the mean time, please let me know what you thought in the comments!

Rereading Jurassic Park After a Decade . . .

This June has been a wonderful month. A dinosaur filled month.

I’ve studied up on paleontology with Darren Naish’s Dinopedia, got to see some dinos in my favorite settings with Prehistoric Planet Ep. 2: Deserts, and then finally saw the most recent ‘Jurassic’ film TWICE(!), Jurassic World Dominion.

But I’ve only got time this month for one more Dino-centric post and I thought it might be fun to go back to the beginning with a reflective review of Michael Crichton’s original Jurassic Park novel.

For a lot of people, this is the thing that started it all. The thing that, in Naish’s view:

“. . . did more to introduce the public to the “modern view” of dinosaurs — the Dinosaur Renaissance view — than any other effort.”

Naish, Darren; Dinopedia: A Brief Compendium of Dinosaur Lore. (2021)

In the days of my youth . . .

I’m pretty sure that it was the film which first fascinated me as a child (I was only 3 months old when the book came out) but without this book, there never would have been a film (although Naish says there was a screenplay in 1983 so perhaps it still would have been).

This book seems to be another book lost to the record of not having GoodReads before 2011 (see Rereading Dune After a Decade), but if memory serves this was a book I was supposed to read in my senior year of high school (big year for me as a SFF reader it seems), but the teacher decided he was tired of teaching that particular Crichton novel and decided we should read Sphere instead (side note: I got very sick that year and tried to read Sphere with a 104 degree fever so I wouldn’t have to catch up when I got back to school. Needless to say, I hallucinated several parts of that book and it was absolutely terrifying. Perhaps it’s good that did not happen with JP).

Heartbroken, I think I ended up complaining to my dad and he presented me with his old copy, assumedly from 1995, if I tracked down the right edition, when the movie came out and he first read it.

No surprise, I was completely enthralled. I remember thinking Malcom was even cooler than he was in the movie, and probably thought I’d try to become a Chaotician if such things existed until I remembered that would literally just be a mathematician and I DID NOT like math during those times (I suppose math and I get along these days but I’m still not very practiced at it). Ironically, I don’t think reading this book kindled any desire in young me to become a paleontologist.

And Now?

Now that I’m older, and upon a second read, I think my opinion of the book has become a little more nuanced.

Actor Sam Neill (Alan Grant) has been quoted as saying today’s moviegoers would no longer accept Jurassic Park‘s slow-burn action pacing. In much the same way, the structure of Crichton’s masterpiece does not read at all like modern thriller. The opening pages are more or less a thesis on the state of (then) modern genetics research which reads more like a wikipedia article than a novel. It takes many chapters (in essence several prologues) to even meet any of our main characters with a kind of unfolding mystery that eventually leads us to the park.

My writer brain attributes this to the shear amount of situations Crichton needs to set up so he can dump exposition about dinosaurs on us without seeming to. Essentially, he’s worldbuilding, which is kind of strange to think about because we already know where we’re trying to get to, which is Jurassic Park, the name of the novel. However, certainly back in the early 90’s when this book first came out, a combined amusement park and zoo centered around genetically reincarnated dinosaurs must have seemed a pretty strange and (ahem) novel idea. We do not have that luxury of ignorance of what the novel is going to be about. We’ve known what this novel was about since about the time we were born.

Eventually the action does begin though, and when it does, it is thrilling in the extreme. Crichton really knows how to make his characters work for their survival and this novel was a great example of that. There were enough differences between the novel and the film that nobody who survived one, would be guaranteed to survive the other (slight spoiler: two character deaths in particular were baffling to me especially because one has a very prominent role in the sequel The Lost World! I’m tempted to dive into the next one just to see how he survived).

Again my writer brain derived quite a bit of enjoyment picking apart the differences between the novel and the film (both subtle and blatant) and pondering why certain changes were made and how they added to, or took away from the dramatic effect.

Of course, the part I loved the most about the whole thing was the dinosaurs themselves! Nearly every dinosaur description and behavior written into this book should be taken with a grain of salt (again take a look at Naish’s Dinopedia for the major mistakes). Some of this is because we’ve learned so much since this book came out, and some of it is choices Crichton made for dramatic effect, but either way, the dinosaurs are just sooo coooool.

Also, there was a considerable amount of things he got right which was also great to read.

Finally, now that I’m older, and I have learned a little bit more about the subjects featured in this awesome book, it was really cool to see just HOW MUCH research Crichton did to write this book. Of course the dinosaurs themselves, but also other little things like Dr. Alan Grant being a hadrosaur expert, and centering his career around studying their nests, which was a reference to Jack Horner, a real paleontologist who studied hadrosaur nests and consulted on the JP film when it came out.

I’d be remiss if I did not admit that there were other awkward parts in the in the novel besides the pacing which made it feel a bit dated. I caught a few objectifications of Dr. Ellie Sattler though certainly he has come a long way since novels like Easy Go.

Also, a chapter near the end entitled “Destroying the World” in which Malcom explains to Hammond the many different paradigm shifts our earth has encountered. How currently most organisms need oxygen to survive when three billion years ago plants producing oxygen actually created a crisis for contemporary organism for which it was a poison much like we consider fluorine.

When Hammond brings up that the ozone layer is getting thinner, Malcom suggests that: “Ultraviolet radiation is good for life. It’s powerful energy. It promotes mutation, change. Many forms of life will thrive with more UV radiation.”

Eventually he ends the segment with:

“Let’s be clear. The planet is not in jeopardy. We are in jeopardy. We haven’t got the power to destroy the planet — or to save it. But we might have the power to save ourselves.”

Crichton, Michael; Jurassic Park pg. 369 (1995)

Now it seems to me, that the point he is trying to make here is exactly the type of point Maclom would make which is: Life will find a way.

Even if that life is not human beings. That we should be less worried about “the planet” and more worried about ourselves. At least that is the way I WANT to read this chapter.

However, I’ve heard some things about Crichton being a climate change denier (check out his talk a Cal Tech in 2003 called Aliens Cause Global Warming). Apparently his opinions on climate change are made very clear in the “Afterward” of State of Fear, a novel which I own and enjoyed but apparently did not read thoroughly enough. I’m sure at some point there will be a follow up.

So Did it Hold Up?

In my opinion, yes. Jurassic Park is still a great novel despite the way times have changed around it. I think that some of the paleontology has matured since 1990, as well as some of our social attitudes, and modern readers may struggle with the pacing at the beginning, but ultimately, I think this one still thrills to read. Highly recommend.

That’s all I have for this time around. Has anyone read this? What were your favorite parts? What is your favorite dino? Would love to talk about this one!

Until next time . . .

IT’S FINALLY HERE! Jurassic World Dominion! (a review)

I finally saw it! I finally saw it twice!!

Last Friday, June 10th 2022, twenty-nine years (why not thirty?) after the original Jurassic Park’s release back in 1993, Jurassic World Dominion “closed” out the franchise with new and old Dinos, new and old friends, and weirdly a whole lot of bugs.

As is my usual, I did not have time to blog about it after I saw it Friday night, and of course I did not have time to blog about it after I saw it again on Sunday night, but finally I’m finished working on all my other projects (*cough* newsletter quarterly fiction for July first! *cough* sign up please!) and thought it might be a great topic for #JurassicJune2022’s third post (also check out #JurassicJune posts from all years).

So, keep reading if you’re curious about my general thoughts and impressions. Was it another classic? Or a terrible disappointment? How about a fitting “ending” to the franchise? (I have no faith it’s actually over).

General Thoughts and Impressions

I genuinely enjoyed it! I’ll save caveats and analysis for later sections of the post, and just write what my heart has told me, which was that I enjoyed this movie.

As I’ve said before (and will definitely say again), I’m a big fan of anything dinosaur related, and it doesn’t take much for me to get excited by your art if it includes one (but hopefully more than one!). I’m sure a lot of this stems from my original sense of awe, fear, and wonder learning about them as a kid, and I am under no illusions that the original Jurassic Park film likely played a huge role in that.

Going into the film, I fully recognized that bringing back all the old cast members and combining their adventure with the new Jurassic World cast, was a blatant appeal to my sense of nostalgia (which I generally don’t enjoy), but everyone has their kryptonite, and this franchise is definitely mine.

As such, what I wanted from the movie was dinosaurs, and hey, there were dinosaurs, so I was having a great time no matter what.

“Inevitably, underlying instabilities begin to appear”
— Ian Malcom

Ugh. If I was a better blogger, I would have just used Malcom’s chaos theory quotes from the original novel (at the section breaks) as all the headings, but I’ll limit that gimmick to just this once.

In answer to my earlier questions, I do not think this film will achieve the title of “classic” that the first film has, or which even The Lost World carries, but I did not feel that it was the overwhelmingly ‘creative disappointment’ reported by IndieWire. I can definitely agree that there was a lot of time devoted to call backs and fan-service, making the film feel a bit more like a museum exhibit than an adventure film.

But the funny thing about fan-service is, it’s for the fans! And as a fan myself, I enjoyed picking up each of the references (also I enjoyed the more paleontology related Easter-eggs like the name of the lecture hall Malcom lectures in though I didn’t spot that one myself).

Flaws in the system will now become severe”
— Ian Malcom

Heyyyy! I was able to squeeze a second one in that kind of makes some sense.

What I mean is, much of the feedback I received (which I can’t link to because it was IRL) from friends was that they didn’t enjoy the movie because creating dinosaurs was “obviously” a bad idea. How did anyone suspect that this would go right?

Most of this was from people younger than me, which I found fascinating for two reasons. The first was because it occurred to me that they had probably grown up in a world which already took for granted the lessons of corporate abuse, and the danger of “genetic power” which this franchise was trying to teach, but made no connection (and in some cases refused to acknowledge) that these movies were probably a large part of the reason that belief was so prevalent.

They spent the entire movie wondering how people could be so dumb as to create dinosaurs and their suspension of disbelief was broken not because dinosaurs could be created (swallowed that pill easily enough), but that at each step along the timeline, the active agents didn’t turn back, and that the situations continued to get worse.

Isn’t that how fiction works? This is not the only movie (or book) I’ve heard this from recently and I’d love to dive deeper into it, but it’s not a topic for this post.

But what these conversations really showed me, was just how much we’re in a strange place right now with many of these “legacy” franchises. Just how delicate the balance film makers (or any creatives) have to strike between the franchise’s original audience, and those who have come to it later (I’m seeing the same thing with Star Wars, Star Trek, James Bond, The Matrix, and many others)

A Fitting End?

Honestly, I have no trust that this is really the end of the ‘Jurassic‘ movies. If it is, it will be bittersweet for the reasons I stated above in the general impressions part of the post, but I would not be mad at it. These days it almost seems more bold and daring to let an IP go extinct than to keep it going.

As for whether or not you should go see it? I’m still going to recommend it, but I also just love dinosaurs THAT much . . .

Thanks for reading. Please leave your thoughts in the comments below. I’m curious what y’all thought of the new dinosaurs and of the movie as a whole. Excited to talk about his one!!

See you next time.

#PreshistoricPlanet Ep. 2: Deserts – An Oasis of Dinosaur Fact and Wonder

Looks like we’re moving right along with our second post for #JurassicJune (2022), this time it’s a review of the second episode of Prehistoric Planet, a new (ish) show on Apple+ which takes a documentary style look at our humble blue marble, and attempts to recreate what it would look like back in our ancient past during the Cretaceous period (between 145 – 66 million years ago).

Two (ish) weeks ago I gave my initial thoughts on episode 1 -“Coasts”, which were generally enthusiastic, and awed by what the show has been able to accomplish. I loved watching the little T. Rexes hunt baby turtles (although obvi I was sad for the baby turtles to die) and seeing the Pterosaurs take a leap of faith off the coastal cliffs caused my heart to soar (I’m thinking Ptero“soar” was an opportunity missed by science). I was a little confused by where we were in time, and I felt without that grounding, it was a little discombobulating but I deemed that a general audience would probably find it fine, and that I was only curious because I’m a huge dinosaur nerd.

In the end, I was looking forward to the next chapter, and even — since it was centered around desert climates — anticipating the possibility that I might get to see some of my favorite dinosaurs from Egypt, like Paralititan and Spinosaurus.

Unfortunately, those hopes were dashed pretty quickly, but I did get to watch some giant sauropods duke it out in a fight for supremacy over the affections of lady sauropods relaxing nearby. The sauropods in question were Dreadnoughtus Schrani (meaning “fears nothing”) discovered in Argentina by Kenneth Lacovara who long-time blog followers may recognize as the author of Why Dinosaurs Matter which I reviewed in 2021 for #DinosaurDay. As if the image of these massive beasts fighting weren’t striking enough, the added image of orange air sacks which went up the animal’s necks in columns, inflating and deflating as a kind of mating display was weird and amazing all at once. According to ‘Prehistoric Planet’: an unofficial scientific guide to ‘Deserts’, their use here was speculative, but even so, I found it both intriguing and fascinating to ponder.

Perhaps the next most interesting part for me was again about the Pterosaurs. I was struck by the massive tuning fork like crests showed in the last episode (it seemed like it would be a foil to flight but apparently it isn’t), but was more staggered to see that some of the males do not have them, and would essentially impersonate female pterosaurs to get close to them without alerting the dominant male. Then, if it was a match, they’d essentially sneak around behind the other male’s back. #PrehistoricSoapOpera

Finally, my last favorite bit was about the hadrosaurs. It was really strange to see them roaming the desert sands in search of an oasis, and to think they might have been adapted to hear the ocean’s waves over long distances, and use the stars in the sky to navigate. This is something I’d love to do some more of my own reading on, and really see how the scientists think it might have worked (and maybe it will find its way into a future Egypt and Dinosaur adventure!)

Anyway, I thought this was a great episode, and I’m really excited to watch the next one!

What were your thoughts? Anything strike you as being completely fascinating? Too unbelievable? Let me know in the comments.


Wow, thank you for reading all the way down through the post. I’m glad you enjoyed #PreshistoricPlanet Ep. 2: Deserts – An Oasis of Dinosaur Fact and Wonder. This may be a weird spot for an ad or newsletter signup, but as you may have guessed, this episode’s desert setting really spoke to me, and seemed a well of information I might be able to use in future iterations in my Ancient Egypt and Dinosaurs setting.

If such a setting sounds intriguing to you, I recommend you check out my short story Narmer and the God Beast. I hope you enjoy reading it as much as I have enjoyed writing it.

It’s #DinosaurDay again! Celebrate with ‘Dinopedia: A Brief Compendium of Dinosaur Lore’

Well, it’s June 1st again, which means it’s the first day of #JurassicJune, and perhaps more fun, #DinosaurDay!

I’m still not entirely sure what I’m supposed to do to celebrate this random holiday, but I’ve decided to do the same thing as I did last year and review a dinosaur book (last year’s pick was Kenneth Lacrovara’s Why Dinosaurs Matter).

This year, we have Darren Naish’s Dinopedia: A Brief Compendium of Dinosaur Lore. Naish seems to have all kinds of credits to his name, but I most recently recognized him as a scientific advisor on Disney+’s Prehistoric Planet.

But my first exposure to this work, did not come through the House of Mouse, but from The Inquisitive Biologist’s post reviewing Dinopedia.

I briefly re-read the review before writing my own, but I’ll try to keep this post filled with my own opinions though I’m sure there will be some overlap.

So What Did I think?

I really enjoyed this one. I’ve never tried to read a book like this before, even though dinosaurs have been a topic which has fascinated me since I was a kid, and I found the experience quite rewarding even though there were moments I felt a bit out of my depth.

I think it’s worth noting up front that this compendium is not meant to be read from front to back like a novel (which is what I did), but perhaps realizes its truest self when read like a website, linking from topic to topic as interest piques in one section or another. However, now that I have read each of the entries, I’ll know what’s inside, and if I’m researching in another place and I encounter a word I don’t know (realistically the name of a group or clade), I can easily find it and quickly study up before continuing on with whatever else I’m working on (Huh, I suppose that’s how encyclopedias are used after all hahah).

Perhaps the book’s best feature, is Naish’s prose themselves. He’s clearly expert in a variety of subject matters, but the text never reads like a textbook. He’s by turns funny, ironic, and serious, whatever the occasion calls for. Some of my favorite parts were when he did (humbly) inject his own opinion into matters. Perhaps the funniest description came from the entry on Scansoriopterygids (try that one in your next scrabble game), specifically when talking about a dinosaur named Yi Qi (translates to Strange Wing; so cool):

“Just about all of them [artistic reconstructions of Yi Qi] made this derpy, pigeon-sized creature into a black screaming nightmare dragon of death, where as in reality it would surely have looked more like a grayish parrot.”

Naish, D. Dinopedia: A Brief Compendium of Dinosaur Lore, 2021, pg. 152

This is probably the most overtly funny line from the book, but that humor is always there in the background, making the reader smile even as they want to cry because another word which they thought ended in “–saur” has been discovered to possibly also end in “–oid”, “–ine” or “–saurus” (this is just science in general I think though, chemistry was way worse for me in this way).

Finally, I’ll admit that while learning about the taxonomy of these amazing creatures was interesting in its own right, I would have definitely enjoyed a few more entries which discussed their importance to the larger world, either in paleontology, or the culture at large. The entry on Jurassic Park may not have been terribly interesting considering most of us know at least the film, if not the novel, but the entries on the Zallinger Mural, the Birds Are Not Dinosaurs (BAND) movement, or Zigong Dinosaur Museum were fascinating, and really allowed the reader to build up a picture of what these creatures mean (as well as add a few destinations to my vacation bucket list).

Naish said in the beginning of the book that at the outset of his writing he had the goal in mind to have the book be entirely about the cultural affect these creatures have had but that having to explain the taxonomical elements got in the way . . . Now that he’s written the Dinopedia I hope he finds the time to try his original vision again. Heck, if we get stuck while reading the new book, we’ve got a handy guide to help us through.

Anyway, that’s pretty much all I have on this one. It’s an interesting read and I highly recommend it to anyone who’s looking to take their knowledge of Dinosaurs to the next level.

What did y’all think of this one? What’s your fav dinosaur mentioned within the text (besides Spinosaurus lol). What was your favorite bit of history or culture? Let’s talk about this one in the comments!

Oh and because I’m me, I’ve listed every book mentioned within the text so that I can link to them if I get around to reviewing them here on this blog so . . . here’s that list (in no particular order):

  • All Yesterdays by C.M. Kösemen, Darren Naish, and John Conway
  • On the Origin of the Species by Charles Darwin
  • The Dinosaur Heresies by Robert Bakker
  • Raptor Red by Robert Bakker
  • The Origin of Birds by Gerhard Heilmann
  • The Age of Birds by Alan Feduccia
  • The Origin and Evolution of Birds by Alan Feduccia
  • Riddle of the Feathered Dragons by Alan Feduccia
  • Bully for Brontosaurus by Jay Gould
  • The Horned Dinosaurs by Peter Dodson (“We got Dodson over here!”)
  • The Hot-Blooded Dinosaurs by Adrian Desmond
  • Jurassic Park by Michael Chrichton
  • West of Eden by Harry Harrison
  • Digging Dinosaurs by Jack Horner
  • The Complete T. Rex by Jack Horner and Don Lessem
  • Predatory Dinosaurs of the World by Greg Paul
  • Jurassic West: The Dinosaurs of the Morrison Formation and Their World by John Foster
  • The Dinosauria by Halszka Osmoska, David Weishampel, and Peter Dodson
  • The Complete Illustrated Guide to Dinosaur Skeletons by Greg Paul
  • The Princeton Field Guide to Dinosaurs by Greg Paul
  • The Sauropod Dinosaurs: Life in the Age of Giants by Mark Hallett and Mathew Wedel
  • African Dinosaurs Unearthed by Gerhard Maier
  • Dinosaurs of the Isle of Wight by Darren Naish and David Martill
  • The Age of Reptiles edited by Rosemary Volpe
  • Dinosaurs and Other Archosaurs by John Ostrom

See you next time!!